In his column for Sport24 this week, Tank Lanning suggests that a 15 vs 14 man game is unsustainable in a professional world, so has come up with a few eyebrow raising alternate red card punishments.
Tank Lanning
A few things stood out for me in last weekend’s deluge of Super Rugby:
The return of the Sharks scrum. Perhaps forced to set a little higher given how wet the Kings Park field was, Jannie du Plessis scrummed really well, while Dale Chadwick was monumental in taming two seriously competent Lions tighthead props.
In turn, the demise of the Lions scrum. Denied the ability to set really low and scrum as an 8 in the wet, a pack that has dominated most scrums they have played against, was forced into playing second fiddle. And without this potent weapon in their armoury, the men from Joburg looked even more blunt than they did in week one of the tournament.
The New Zealanders ability to make 3 passes in the 5 metres between tram line and touchline, compared to the inability of some South African sides to make 3 passes before the tramline.
The fantastic performances from Jesse Kriel and Handre Pollard in a losing Bulls cause. They are the reason I see the Pretoria glass of beer as half full rather than half empty. Also – 1 centimetre less of touchline whitewash and the Bulls would be 1 from 2 instead of 0 from 2.
Sponsor activations like the tranche of singing school kids waving yellow and red flags at Newlands and the monster USN branding in Bloemfontein are aimed at taking up the masses of empty seats we are now seeing at stadia every weekend. So instead of addressing the empty seats issue, franchises are giving even more power to the TV folk.
And perhaps the most pertinent: The red card issued to Hayden Triggs for punching Duane Vermeulen. That Triggs deserved red is not up for debate, but whether the game can afford 15 vs 14 mismatches is. And for those Cape Town folk still enjoying the rosy glow from Saturday’s win, think back to when Bismarck du Plessis was wrongfully sent from the field against the All Blacks.
Rugby is a team game, so I like the fact that a red card punishes not only the miscreant individual, but also the team. One for all, and all for one sort of thing. But given that some red card offences go unpunished during a game (see Owen Franks and Kane Hames just this weekend), some are wrongfully handed out (see Bismarck) and that it ruins the game as a spectacle (something both fans, and perhaps more importantly, sponsors looking for a return on their investment, do not deserve), perhaps the handling of a red card needs a revisit?
A few options to consider: The guilty player is subbed and the game carries on as a 15 vs 15 man affair. The guilty player is sent from the field for 20 minutes, then subbed and the game carries on as a 15 vs 15 man affair. The guilty player is subbed and the opposition get to choose another player that also has to be subbed, and game carries on as a 15 vs 15 man affair.
I quite like the latter (as suggested to me on Twitter), but I also think we should consider something even more grievous to the team as a whole. How about one of the above 3 options so the game continues as a 15 vs 15 man affair, but the side suffering the red card – subject to it being ratified by post-match a judicial enquiry – also gets docked 2 log points no matter the result? That way the team and union also get punished for the individual’s offence.
Extreme, yes, but given that the team suffering the current punishment of having a player sent from the field are going to lose the game 9 times out of 10, and thus miss out on a potential 4 or 5 log points, perhaps it is not that extreme?
It also makes the red card in the 1st minute of the game more equitable with the red card handed out in the 78th minute. Something that is not currently the case.
I think these are all brilliant suggestions, perhaps one to consider would be to sub the player and award a penalty try to the injured party? This is a real game changer and perhaps would add the correct pressure on players to keep it tidy?
Whilst I understand this has nothing to do with cricket I did consider how spectators felt at the SA vs India match, imagine paying full price for a ticket in a stadium packed to the rafters to watch your side go out with over 130 runs needed, no value in that. Similarly watching 75 minutes of rugby with only 29 players on the field regardless of who you support adds very little spectator value and dulls the win from a team that is firing well.
Let the opposition side pick a sub? Now there is an interesting idea. All those bench warmers who hardly get to see a game could be in for an exciting ride. Yes, still have the 10 min sin bin, but the red card player can go to the showers and the sub can sit in the hot seat. Like it!
Red card situations are always extreme events and the solutions proposed all have their downsides. I don’t believe subbing is the answer (it could backfire if a “splinter” comes off the bench, has a blinder and wins the game for his team – with no thanks to any coaching genius in the substitution!
Although on a lighter note, in our backyard sevens/tens touch games we had a rule that if a player “sinned” badly (RED) – to keep the numbers even, the aggrieved captain could chose to either allow the opposition a sub or take the opposition’s sub in his own side and send a “donkey” player from his side to play in the opposing team. Sometimes this also backfired with hilarious results but in all cases a penalty try was given to the opposition which was a good deterrent to keep play clean.